Sep 27, 2011
A “hidden” code linked to the DNA of plants allows them to develop and pass down new biological traits more rapidly than previously thought, according to research by scientists at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies and The Scripps Research Institute.
The study, published recently in the journal Science, provides the first evidence that an organism’s “epigenetic” code—an extra layer of biochemical instructions in DNA—can evolve more quickly than the genetic code and can strongly influence biological traits.
While the study was limited to a commonly studied single plant species called Arabidopsis thaliana, the findings hint that the traits of other organisms, including humans, might also be dramatically influenced by biological mechanisms that scientists are just beginning to understand.
“I have been a genetics researcher for 25 years and rarely have I seen, let alone participated in, a ‘game changing’ study,” said Nicholas Schork, a professor of Molecular and Experimental Medicine at Scripps Research and collaborating data analyst for the study. “The results of this work will require reshaping of long-held beliefs about how inherited factors contribute to phenotypic expression.”
“Our study shows that it’s not all in the genes,” said Joseph Ecker, a professor in Salk’s Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Laboratory, who led the research team. “We found that these plants have an epigenetic code that’s more flexible and influential than we imagined. There is clearly a component of heritability that we don’t fully understand. It’s possible that we humans have a similarly active epigenetic mechanism that controls our biological characteristics and gets passed down to our children. “
With the advent of techniques for rapidly mapping the DNA of organisms, scientists have found that the genes stored in the four-letter DNA code don’t always determine how an organism develops and responds to its environment. The more biologists map the genomes of various organisms (their entire genetic code), the more they are discovering discrepancies between what the genetic code dictates and how organisms actually look and function.
In fact, many of the major discoveries that led to these conclusions were based upon studies in plants. There are traits such as flower shape and fruit pigmentation in some plants that are under the control of this epigenetic code. Such traits, which defy the predictions of classical Mendelian genetics, are also found in mammals. In some strains of mice, for instance, a tendency for obesity can pass from generation to generation, but no difference between the genetic code of fat mice and thin mice explains this weight difference.
Scientists have even found that identical human twins exhibit different biological traits, despite their matching DNA sequences. They have theorized that such unexplained disparities could be the work of epigenetic variation.
Scientists have traced these mysterious patterns to chemical markers that serve as a layer of genetic control on top of the DNA sequence. Just as genetic mutations can arise spontaneously and be inherited by subsequent generations, epigenetic mutations can emerge in individuals and spread into the broader population.
Although scientists have identified a number of epigenetic traits, very little was known about how often they arose spontaneously, how quickly they could spread through a population and how significant an influence they could have on biological development and function.
“Perception of the extent of epigenetic variation in plants from generation to generation varies widely within our scientific community,” said Robert Schmitz, a postdoctoral researcher in Eckers’ laboratory and the lead author on the paper. “We actually did the experiment, and found that overall there is very little change between each generation, but spontaneous epimutations do exist in populations and arise at a rate much higher than the DNA mutation rate, and at times they had a powerful influence over how certain genes were expressed.”
Mapping the Epigenome
In the study, the team mapped the epigenome of a population of Arabidopsis plants then observed how this biochemical landscape had changed after 30 generations. This mapping consisted of recording the state of all locations on the DNA molecule that could undergo a chemical modification known as methylation, a key epigenetic change that can alter how certain underlying genes are expressed. They then watched how methylation states of these sites evolved over the generations.
The plants were all clones of a single ancestor, so their DNA sequences were essentially identical across the generations. Thus any changes in how the plants expressed certain genetic traits were likely to be a result of spontaneous changes in their epigenetic code—variations in the methylation of the DNA sites—not the result of variations in the underlying DNA sequences.
“You couldn’t do this kind of study in humans, because our DNA gets shuffled each generation,” Ecker said. “Unlike people, some plants are easily cloned, so we can see the epigenetic signature without all the genetic noise.”
The researchers discovered that as many as a few thousand methylation sites on the plants’ DNA were altered each generation. Although this represents a small proportion of the potentially six million methylation sites estimated to exist on Arabidopsis DNA, it dwarfs the rate of spontaneous change seen at the DNA sequence level by about five orders of magnitude.
This suggests that the epigenetic code of plants—and, by extension, other organisms—is far more fluid than their genetic code.
Even more surprising was the extent to which some of these changes turned genes on or off. A number of plant genes that underwent heritable changes in methylation also experienced substantial alterations in their expression - the process by which genes control cellular function through protein production.
This meant that not only was the epigenome of the plants morphing rapidly despite the absence of any strong environmental pressure, but that these changes could have a powerful influence on the plants’ form and function.
Schork believes that the study will open up and emphasize new avenues of research. “Essentially, this study suggests a couple of very important things. First, if humans have anything like what we observed in plants, genes alone may not control the traits that each of us has; rather our traits are likely influenced in part by heritable factors not actually fixed in DNA sequences that could be manipulated by environmental stimuli. Second, our study clearly suggests that interdisciplinary and collaborative science exploring very fundamental biological questions should be encouraged and pursued given the complexities of human phenotypic expression.”
In addition to Schork, Ecker, and Schmitz, authors of the paper, “Transgenerational Epigenetic Instability Is a Source of Novel Methylation Variants,” are Matthew D. Schultz of Salk and the University of California, San Diego; Mathew G. Lewsey, Ronan C. O’Malley, and Mark A. Urich of Salk; and Ondrej Libiger of Scripps Research. For more information, see Science Magazine
The research is supported by the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the Gordon and Betty Moore foundation and the Mary K. Chapman Foundation.
—Story taken from: Scripps, News and Views